The Isness of Peace + Trust Zoominar Oct 18 + Will Barney Oct 26

A:    The reason is because out of the three parties to the transaction, only one of them is fraudulent. That is the so-called lender. You, the customer, are producing value with the hard earned money you are paying; and we, the merchant, are providing value with our hard earned product. It is ethical and sound thus far. We should be paid and you should receive good value, rightfully so. It is when the international crime syndicate called the money lenders insert themselves into the middle of the transaction and attempt to extort their cut, that we draw the line. No money came out of their accounts to issue the loan — it was created out of thin air using the Mandrake Mechanism — and no value came out of them either, in the way of goods or services.

One could argue, well, they provide the medium of exchange — i.e. the money, and administer that system. If so, then the honest way to do it would be for them to charge a small nominal fee, such as 0.01% of every transaction worldwide, for maintaining the money system. That might be fair. It would be open, honest, transparently visible, and mutually agreed upon by everyone. But paying “back” 100% of the value of the transaction PLUS usurious interest, is nothing less than outright theft and extortion. It is a parasitic influence on the global economy and has destroyed countless lives. That is wrong and must be stopped.

We are not harming anyone or taking anything that isn’t offered, by accepting credit cards to pay for our products. On the contrary, as sovereigns, we are exercising our God-given right to transact in commerce and provide our goods and services using whatever medium of exchange society has most agreed upon. The fact that a corrupt cabal has tried to insert itself as a fraudulent party to the transaction is the reason for our withdrawing our support from that behavior.
Further, for every debt cancellation system we sell, and for every debt cancellation system a new customer implements, the economy is improved by that much. The economy is improved because money that was otherwise going to the international crime syndicate — which they then use to hire armies of mercenaries to organize the banking and court systems against us — is money that is now going instead to one’s own (presumably) harmless and life-supporting home living and household expenses and perhaps education or creative and constructive projects. It is withdrawing money from what is harmful in the world and redirecting it to what is helpful. That is a most beautiful fulfillment of the purpose of ethics.

The Foundation Center, which merged with Candid organization, provides a rich treasury of information on grants to individuals and humanitarian arts projects as well as job opportunities. See their site at this link. (Click on “Candid at a glance” in the upper right).

The Philanthropy News Digest newsletter provides news about a wide variety of job opportunities and invitations to receive grants for people involved in the arts. Subscribe to their free email newsletter at this link.

The Foundation Directory Online from the Foundation Center provides a rich resource of grant sources (LINK). They have 140,000+ grantmakers and 12 million+ grants available.

Grants to Individuals information is at this link. 

Please join us on a live Zoom video conference.  So much has happened since Will’s last Zoom meeting with us. 

Independently, his research and networking developed into inside connections with all kinds of White Hats – – people in government, in the corporate world, and other independents who are having an influential effect on bringing down the tyrannical and enslaving system, and replacing the people and practices that harm humanity with new people and practices that are creative, compassionate, life-supporting, and benevolent.

It is this multi-decade long focus of research and communication, combined with his naturally compassionate and humanitarian manner, that led him into trusted relationships with insiders who otherwise would prefer to remain hidden from the less conscious types. He has earned their trust, and so they are willing to disclose the inside workings of things with him. His reports convey what is allowed to be conveyed, without breaking confidences.

Q:   You have recommended for us to keep our trust activities quiet. This seems to imply keeping a low profile and not operating businesses and activities outside the trust that might draw the scrutiny of the tax man. Is this correct and if so, do you have broad guidelines as to what might raise unnecessary tax scrutiny (waving a red flag in front of a bull)?

We stay out of that profile. You have surely noticed we don’t promote our trusts with “be free of those nasty income taxes” emblazoned in some high-profile headlines. We keep it quieter – – embedded way down in the middle of smaller text, and stated correctly, factually, professionally, and conservatively. We have no anti-tax or anti-government language anywhere in our trusts or in our marketing materials.

If you become an NLT operator, we would encourage you to do the same. Just live peacefully and go about your business. Don’t be foolish enough to go reaching out to the tax people and asking them anything about these trusts. It’s none of their business and it is most certainly not their expertise. If they were to contact you about it, which would be most rare and unusual, of course we would help you with how to respond. But as long as you don’t volunteer to mention it to them, and if you just live peacefully, it is 99+% likely that they will never bother you.

As far as a 501c3 is concerned, you would have no need for it. First of all, it gives very little benefits for all the bureaucratic red tape you would have to put up with. And, the exemption that it provides could be revoked at any time. It is very much a subject slave kind of entity. For example, ministers in churches have their free speech limited when their church is in a 501c3. They can’t discuss politics from the pulpit. For churches, a 508 corporation sole has far more benefits. And we at BIC provide 508s as well. Nevertheless, the NLT has all the benefits of a 508 plus more. A church or a charity can operate most successfully from an NLT.

Your second question has the phrase “In light of keeping a prudent low profile”, but remember, I never said you had to do that. That’s not necessary. All that is necessary is to perform your life mission peacefully using the NLT and simply avoid making contact with harmful entities, agencies, and organizations. Just steer clear of them, that’s all. But otherwise, perform your charitable works with as high a profile as you would like. There is no need to publicize what kind of legal entity the charity is in. Why broadcast that to the world?

Now if you want your charity to receive donations, and you want your donors to be able to write those donations off their taxes, the NLT cannot give that to them. For that, you would need a 508. Like I said, we can provide you a 508 as well, if that’s what you need. It’s the same price as the NLT. And since very few people need them, we don’t have it listed on the website, but all you would do is go through the normal ordering process for the NLT, but just put in the notes that instead of an NLT, you would like a 508. Our trust writer will write it for you and guide you in how to operate it.

But if you don’t need your donors to get tax write-offs, then you’re much better off simply with an NLT.

As to employees, just do as you normally do, except that if they’re paid from the NLT, you would do no withholding or 1099s, etc. Even better, get each of your employees to have their own NLTs. Then change the contract with them so that instead of being employees, they become independent contractors with you. They would do the same work for the same pay, but the paperwork would call them independent contractors . . . so your contract with them would not fall under employee laws.

It has been coming to our attention at BIC that various popular speakers out there about asset protection are giving patently wrong information about trusts. Let’s set the record straight.

For example, one of our trust customers wrote: “I just listened to [a popular speaker] on procedures etc. and he stated emphatically that the banks were not going to honor Natural Law Trusts without vetting completely, and that we might have to wait weeks before we become solvent. This makes me nervous . . .”

Speakers who say such things are either grossly misinformed or are deliberately mischievous liars, motivated by selling their own trusts instead, or motivated by setting up a lot of nouveau riche people to be easy prey for theft of their new assets. The fact that hundreds of thousands of people worldwide use NLTs or something similar to it, and have for generations . . . the fact that they’ve been used by some of the world’s richest families for generations . . . and the fact that millions of dollars flow through them every day in banks all over the world . . . should tell you that the NLT is one of the world’s most well-established trust traditions. We have even heard that the Federal Reserve and the Vatican use them, albeit for less benevolent purposes.

No “bank” worth its salt is going to “dishonor” it. If they do, they may be so stupid and/or so corrupt that you wouldn’t want to do business with them anyway. NLTs are based on the most universally accepted traditional laws that haven’t changed in centuries. Smile, thank them, and walk down the street to a different bank. Bring your business where there is intelligence and wisdom.

Another correspondent wrote to us saying “I am expecting a confirmation on the question as to why a trust in full transparency is required by the exchange as is to be a revocable grantor trust by the top Intel provider who has over 2000 people paying $100 per year for their services.”

First, it is very well known in the most respected international trust circles that a “grantor trust” is a sham. A grantor trust is one in which the grantor stays in control of it and signs on all of its authorizations. The reason it is a sham is that it is therefore not even really a trust. It is simply one person creating an alter ego. Judges and courts have penetrated those trusts many times and removed their assets. Thus at BIC we specialize only in non-grantor trusts.

Likewise, for anyone who has read our trust eBook, it is made very clear that a revocable trust affords no asset protection at all. This is well known and well accepted even in the statutory trust field among attorneys. Any quality asset protection specialist will tell you that “living trusts” and revocable trusts provide little if any asset protection. Only irrevocable trusts provide strong asset protection. That is why at BIC we write only irrevocable trusts. Why do you think the wealthy elite only use irrevocable trusts? Why do you think the advanced design out of which the Natural Law Trust evolved long since abandoned the revocable design generations ago?

Perhaps the encouragement for people to get revocable trusts is because if the so-called authorities don’t like what people are doing with their funds, they can revoke the funds. Why else would they encourage people to use only revocable trusts? If a trust is revocable, that makes it very easy to penetrate and take assets back out.

At BIC we do not give people revocable trusts because that would destroy its bullet-proof asset protection, make it vulnerable and weak, and betray the faith of all of our clients – – in addition to violating one of the most well established principles in the international brotherhood of asset protection trusts. We will not do that.

Further, we can assure everyone that no financial institution has the right to require what kind of entity an asset holder has. Anyone who is putting out that nonsense is definitely no “top Intel provider”. Maybe they are “top mischief providers”, but not “Intel providers”.

It is interesting to note that other “top intel providers” have said that the banks “require” a non-statutory trust. So whom are we going to believe? The bottom line is – – one needs to think like a king or a queen instead of a pawn. It is YOUR assets you are protecting. You need to think in terms of what is best to prevent the loss or theft of your own assets – – not what so-called “authorities” pretend to be “requiring”. If they do spread the rumor that revocable trusts are “required”, then they are imposters posing as true authorities and trying to set people up to have their assets confiscated!

The truth about BIC’s NLT is that – – knock on wood, to this day, we know of no NLT clients who have ever had their trusts penetrated or invalidated – – in over six or seven decades of use. That’s a 100% success rate. Success speaks for itself.

It is important to address timing as well. We receive emails frequently saying things more or less like “the QFS (Quantum Financial System) is expected to go public very soon”. Do you realize how many hundreds of times we have heard that in the last decades? We clearly separate ourselves from the false sellers of hopium, by never predicting dates. At BIC we have stood in our integrity by refraining from getting people’s hopes up unnecessarily, and creating false urgency to buy our trusts.

We invite our clients to think as sovereigns. We do not need “clearance” and we do not rely upon outside authorities as to how we should protect our assets. Any user of a Natural Law Trust should think as a sovereign, and stop looking to others to tell one how to protect one’s assets. If you are holding a valuable asset, either in your personal name or in the name of a trust that you oversee, you are the authority who calls the shots. No bank and no government has the right to tell you what kind of entity you must have to exchange your property, and anyone who tells you otherwise has suspicious motives.

So everyone, please be educated and please be discerning when listening to messengers about the QFS out there. If they are warning you to comply with what the “authorities” are requiring about how to protect your assets, beware! If they are fear-mongering, you can know they are not presenting the truth.

In conclusion, many people have asked us if we are prepared with enough staff to handle the flood of trust orders that are going to come when the QFS has been announced. The answer is that it will not explode so quickly as to provide not enough time for everyone to make their arrangements – – both our company to provide trust processing staff AND for the millions of currency holders and the banks to get their acts together. Yes, there will be enough time and there will be all the staff needed when the time comes. Do not worry. There will be plenty of time. It is not going to just be a short open-and-close window as some misleading messengers have predicted.

I honor the place in you that is the same in me.