How both perfect justice AND perfect mercy are fulfilling prophecy

Rising inflation is leading to an increase in defaults on credit cards and auto loans in the US, with levels unseen since the financial crisis. This year has seen credit card delinquencies rise to 3.8%, and car loan defaults at 3.6%, the highest in over a decade, according to Equifax. Low- to middle-income households are particularly affected by increasing costs in essentials like rent and groceries.

A chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, expressed concern: “The increase in delinquencies and defaults is symptomatic of the tough decisions that these households are having to make right now.” Many Americans have resorted to new credit lines to manage their debts, pushing the average credit card interest rate to a record 20.6%. Credit card accounts have increased by 70 million since 2019, and debt exceeded $1 trillion this year, as reported by the New York Federal Reserve. The rising delinquencies have been described as “very concerning.”

With student loan repayments resuming and the holiday season approaching, experts anticipate further financial strain on consumers. Retailers like Macy’s have also noted higher delinquency rates among store cardholders.

Q:  Ethically, I believe in paying my legitimate debts. If I have received real goods and services for the bills I ran up on my credit cards, then why is it ethical for me to not repay those debts?

A:   Because the money lenders were not the sources of those goods and services. The merchants who provided the goods and services were paid, but the money lenders produced nothing. Furthermore, the money lenders never loaned anything. No money ever came out of their accounts to issue your lines of credit. They pretended to make loans, when actually nothing was ever loaned. That is called fraud. That is why this Liberty debt cancelation system legally works. “La Vérité” means “the truth”. We are simply confronting them with the truth, and they cannot deny it. 

Independently, his research and networking developed into inside connections with all kinds of White Hats – – people in government, in the corporate world, and other independents who are having an influential effect on bringing down the tyrannical and enslaving system, and replacing the people and practices that harm humanity with new people and practices that are creative, compassionate, life-supporting, and benevolent.

It is this multi-decade long focus of research and communication, combined with his naturally compassionate and humanitarian manner, that led him into trusted relationships with insiders who otherwise would prefer to remain hidden from the less conscious types. He has earned their trust, and so they are willing to disclose the inside workings of things with him. His reports convey what is allowed to be conveyed, without breaking confidences.

Q:   Why do you call your trust natural? A trust is not something natural. It is created by man under man’s laws. Wo/Man under natural law, with your property protected under common law. Please help me understand.

Our reason for staying with the term Natural Law is very simple. For a sovereign trust to be not subject to the jurisdiction of any one geographic location or any one limited body of manmade laws, and yet for it to stay out of trouble, it needs to adhere to what is essential and universal to all types of laws. Have you read the eBook? This is clearly explained in the section on types of law. What is essential to all types of laws can only be called natural law.

It is not common law, because common law has never been perfect. For example, in the 1800s and early 1900s, under common law, women couldn’t vote, blacks couldn’t vote. Common law has been man’s best attempt to emulate natural law. We call our trust Natural Law because after five or six decades of collecting the world’s best clauses and fine tuning them, it has resulted in an instrument which has a very high degree of perfection. It is unsurpassed, to our knowledge. The concepts and principles in it would stand up not only in any fair court of manmade law, but we daresay it would be equally welcomed and respected by beings in any part of the universe.

At https://brillianceincommerce.com/trust-questions-and-answers/, in the Search window, look up the answers to these questions:

What is the difference between trusts and other legal entities based on natural law, and ones based on statutory law?

I always assumed that Natural Law Trusts was just a fancy name for common law trusts. If not, what is the difference between Natural Law Trusts and Common Law Trusts? What is the wording that makes them different? Anything else makes them different?

Even though the USA was founded on the principle that ALL of us are kings and queens, as confirmed in no less than six US Supreme Court cases – – which all said, in essence, that Americans are sovereigns without subjects, naturally the ancient habit of smaller groups forming themselves into a “superior” group has persisted. It may be unconstitutional, but it has persisted nonetheless, and it has operated through special knowledge. It has inadvertently created a de facto hierarchy, despite the elimination of titles of nobility by the Founding Fathers.

As a result, so-called law schools only teach attorneys the statutory law to which the unawakened and brainwashed masses are subject. That was the wish of the elite. At the same time, the elite themselves used non-statutory trusts, because they didn’t see themselves as being subject to the same rules that they were imposing on everyone else. The Federal Reserve is not a government agency and never has been. It has always been, since the beginning in 1913, a private banking system with various elite shareholders. The IRS has been its collection agency. Hence it is not surprising that the owners of that system would train their IRS agents to deny the existence or the legitimacy of the non-statutory entities. This is in spite of the fact that the elite themselves use them.

They set up the system in America in such a way that it has allowed anyone to realize their own status via self-study, and to thus begin to assert their rights without retaliation from the government. This gave them plausible deniability, enabling them to correctly claim that no institution or agency can deny an American’s rights by force if he realized them correctly on his own. This has been my own experience and that of all of us who work for BIC, as well as a large number of our customers and affiliates. The elite doesn’t try to deny who we really are, when we have realized it on our own. I think they don’t worry about it, because we are such a small minority of the population, and none of us is super rich financially or super powerful politically.

Thus the only way they have been able to perpetrate their fed fraud for the majority of the population is by putting out as much disinformation as possible, to keep the herds of sheep in line. It’s kind of a very clever strategy – – because by not using gunpoint force to overtly enslave everyone, instead they have used psyops (psychological operations). The silver lining for them, as well as for us, is that when the minority rises above this mental conditioning, the elite cannot be accused of forcing the liberated ones back into slavery.

It should then make perfect sense to you that the IRS would deny common law trusts, but I sympathize with your question, because you’re on the outside looking in. If you had been on the inside of the community of sovereign trust operators for five or six decades like we have, you would have been seeing the same as what we have been seeing. That is that in actual practice, the IRS never attacks these trusts. If you find any cases where it appears that they did, it would have only been trusts written differently from our NLTs from BIC. Somehow those others must have had weaknesses and vulnerabilities, all of which we have eliminated in our NLTs. The tax men don’t attack them because that would be shooting themselves in the foot. They know their own elite use similar vehicles. They’d rather keep quiet about it and avoid publicizing the issue.

Think of it as being like the difference between cars driving on the road and airplanes flying in the sky. Cars on the ground have to follow the road rules, which are far more restrictive than the rules that airplanes must follow. In that sense, the airplane is an exception to the road rules. Like that, the NLT is an exception to the rules that statutory entities must follow. We don’t use the word “exempt”, because that’s a statutory term that can be given by the IRS and can be taken away by the IRS. By contrast, the NLT is an exception to those rules, and it doesn’t need a stamp of approval for that exception, any more than an airplane would need a stamp of exemption from road rules. That would be ridiculous. A stamp of approval of exempt or exception status would imply that without it, it would indeed be subject to such rules. How on Earth could an airplane even be imagined to be subject to road rules?

The NLT is an exception to all statutes worldwide issued by governments and their agencies – – including the IRC in the USA. No agency or institution has the authority to remove or deny that exception. This is proven in real life experience by the fact that out of thousands of NLT operators, not a single one has ever been attacked by the IRS or any other tax agency.

Part of the reason for this is how the NLT is written. Another part of the reason is how trustees are instructed to apply for the EIN. There is a certain exact procedure for doing so which must be followed precisely. And another part of the reason is that most NLT operators follow our advice to just keep quiet. The only rights you really have are the rights you KNOW you have. So if you KNOW you have the right to ignore statutory requirements, and you live accordingly, then you just keep quiet about it.

It would be foolhardy to approach a tax systemite and ask him if what I am saying here is true. That would be like waving a red flag in front of a bull, or it would be like deliberately picking a fight with a bully. Of course, if someone is stupid enough to provoke those types of people, that someone would be creating trouble for himself. That is why we say right at the top of our trust eBook, “for Peaceful People”.

Knowing your rights as a sovereign individual, and knowing that the NLT is written in harmony with the universal right of contract, as affirmed in the global UCC and in US Supreme Court cases, you can wisely choose to join the decentralized international brotherhood-sisterhood of NLT operators, and enjoy the same 100% success rate that all the rest have had. 100% success means the trust has never been penetrated, and has never been invalidated. Further, it cannot be invalidated.

I honor the place in you that is the same in me.